Forum Affiliates Network Visit our post exchange directory
December 03, 2008, 12:45:58 AM
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News:
Welcome on the FAN forum!
Sign up and ask questions and get help about running forums and anything related to it!

 
Menu
  Global menu
     Home
     Forum
     PE directory
     Downloads
     Newsletters
  
  Article Categories
     Starting a forum
     Managing a forum
     Advertising
  
  About FAN
     Mission statement
     Link to us
     Contact
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
December 03, 2008, 12:45:58 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Tags: personal message 
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Send this topic  |  Print  
Author Topic: Reading personal messages from other members  (Read 1137 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Harro
Big Boss
Administrator
Hero Member
*****



Reputation: 11
Offline Offline

Admin experience:
Advanced

Posts: 1953


WWW

Awards
« on: March 19, 2007, 02:53:17 PM »

There was an interesting discussion on the SMF forum about reading personal messages from other members.
Was in the dutch part of the forum, so most of you won't understand it..
But what do you think of it?

Do you do it or would you do it?
Or only in certain circumstances (like an argument between 2 members, each telling lies about each other to you).
So basically to find "proof" of misbehaviour.

Or would you never do it?
Logged
Sponsored links

Stop seeing these ads by signing up for a free account!
Serendipity
The Reporter
Newcomer
**



Reputation: 0
Offline Offline

Admin experience:
Intermediate

Posts: 72

Rock Fan


WWW
« Reply #1 on: March 19, 2007, 09:02:18 PM »

I don't think I'd do something like that unless it was absolutely necessary, like if a member was soliciting using PMs. As for "proof", if someone takes the time out to report it, than I'm just going to deal with it normally, why put so much effort into digging around?
Logged
Ghost
Gatekeeper
Full Member
***



Reputation: 1
Offline Offline

Admin experience:
Intermediate

Posts: 160


WWW
« Reply #2 on: March 21, 2007, 02:27:55 AM »

I don't see a reason for myself to do it, what is in your Personal Messages is your personal stuff. If I needed to find "proof" about something then they could give me permission to see the evidence, but then again, they could also change the information in the meantime.
At one time I had a section for things like that on my forum, you filled it out with a copy of the pm and submitted it to the admin. I took it out because it got to be alot of work when people started changing things in the "evidence".
So all and all, I have no reason or any want to know! Unless it violates the forums rules.
Logged

Jacqueline
Newcomer
**

Reputation: 0
Offline Offline

Admin experience:
Advanced

Posts: 53


WWW
« Reply #3 on: March 21, 2007, 03:17:26 AM »

I put in my terms of service that everything is subject to monitoring.  It is very rare that I need to look at private messages, but there have been occasions when I needed to.
Logged

Jacqueline
Harro
Big Boss
Administrator
Hero Member
*****



Reputation: 11
Offline Offline

Admin experience:
Advanced

Posts: 1953


WWW

Awards
« Reply #4 on: March 21, 2007, 06:19:52 PM »

If you want to prevent changes the only thing you can do is digging in the database.
Copy paste or something like that is to easy to change.

Personally I won't do it, except when I suspect there is something wrong or I need evidence.
But when you are the admin of the forum I believe you should have to right to have access to everything related to the forum, so including everything inside the database like personal messages.
Logged
bambolin
Newcomer
**

Reputation: 0
Offline Offline

Admin experience:
Advanced

Posts: 13


WWW
« Reply #5 on: April 28, 2007, 04:33:50 AM »

I will never read PM for any reason. I don't agree with reading PM. As the word says PM is private messaging.
Logged

http://www.hangebu.com - Free link exchange forum, link selling, link buying. Check out our contests! You might get a free site wide link! Smile
Harro
Big Boss
Administrator
Hero Member
*****



Reputation: 11
Offline Offline

Admin experience:
Advanced

Posts: 1953


WWW

Awards
« Reply #6 on: April 28, 2007, 12:08:07 PM »

It's personal message wink
Wouldn't you even read if 2 members are having an argument, each blaming each other?
Logged
Dakuipje
Newcomer
**

Reputation: 0
Offline Offline

Admin experience:
Advanced

Posts: 35


« Reply #7 on: May 14, 2007, 12:34:57 PM »

I wont.
Never, private is private and should remain private wink
Logged
DarkVelocity
King of Spam on FAN
Full Member
***



Reputation: 0
Offline Offline

Admin experience:
Advanced

Posts: 138

Orangez.


WWW
« Reply #8 on: May 14, 2007, 04:44:22 PM »

I wouldn't do the first thing but for members Safety Admins should have the right to look in pm inboxes.
Logged

Dude200
Newcomer
**

Reputation: 0
Offline Offline

Admin experience:
Beginner

Posts: 28


« Reply #9 on: May 15, 2007, 01:01:29 AM »

Over an argument between two members, I wouldn't, however if I suspected a moderator or another staff member doing something bad then yeah, or if a member was reported spamming, trying to hack, etc.

Logged
Miles
GeekInc
Newcomer
**



Reputation: 0
Offline Offline

Admin experience:
Intermediate

Posts: 15


WWW
« Reply #10 on: May 15, 2007, 01:14:24 AM »

I think "Personal Messages" Are just that there personal messages from whom to whomever I think it's a persona l invasion of privacy, But if there was a despute against another user or a threat then I think the administrator's should be able to take action and be able to view the messages
Logged

Give thanks to those that help you, and help those that ask. Lets continue to grow the FAN community to be a friendly helpful place.
My highest respect goes to those kind enough to give their time helping us here, so help make their lives a little easier, read the FAQ's, Search the forum for you
Harro
Big Boss
Administrator
Hero Member
*****



Reputation: 11
Offline Offline

Admin experience:
Advanced

Posts: 1953


WWW

Awards
« Reply #11 on: May 15, 2007, 09:05:13 AM »

Agreed.
Sometimes it is just something you have to do.
But most admins hope that they should never do it I think.
Logged
ilovegames
Newcomer
**

Reputation: 0
Offline Offline

Admin experience:
Beginner

Posts: 34


WWW
« Reply #12 on: August 01, 2007, 04:29:41 AM »

Is there a mod on smf for this?

If so can someone post it here?
Logged

Harro
Big Boss
Administrator
Hero Member
*****



Reputation: 11
Offline Offline

Admin experience:
Advanced

Posts: 1953


WWW

Awards
« Reply #13 on: August 01, 2007, 09:33:18 AM »

There is no such mod and there will never be one that is approved by SMF.
Logged
Owner
Tech Support
Full Member
***

Reputation: 0
Offline Offline

Admin experience:
Professional

Posts: 185

Here to help


WWW
« Reply #14 on: August 01, 2007, 12:35:32 PM »

ok, i dont agree with someone putting an "evidence" board on a forum, no offence but if you got a some thing like that with members posting in there alot, there just strait up stool piggins.. i hate rats, if you dont have anything better to do then to: "tell a moderator" your stupid! frankly, i would look at whos ever pm's i wanted, its my forums, my rules. i dont care when you join my forum, there isent something called "privacy" i got in in my discloser as well. if they dont like it move on, i dont beleave in giving personal information tho.. thats something i would never do, i wouldnt want it too happen to me, so i wouldent do it to others, when gaia gave the cops that guys info they were so wrong, it was in the paper an everything.  they say, bad poblicity is good poblicity
Logged

Tags: personal message 
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Send this topic  |  Print  
 
Jump to:  

SEO and Advertising Techniques

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Seo4Smf v0.2 © Webmaster's Talks

TinyPortal v0.9.8 © Bloc
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.174 seconds with 29 queries.